The statement critiques the process of constitutional amendment, suggesting skepticism about the executive's role in declaring amendments. It uses sarcasm to question the legitimacy of the process and advocates for term limits for Congress.
- The statement uses sarcasm but does not appear to cause harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses sarcasm rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in critique but does not attack individuals personally. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.