The statement critiques the process of constitutional amendment, suggesting skepticism about the executive's role in declaring amendments. It uses sarcasm to question the legitimacy of the process and advocates for term limits for Congress.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement uses sarcasm but does not directly harm others. It questions the process rather than individuals.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses sarcasm rather than constructive dialogue.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in criticism of the process but does not attack individuals personally.
[+1]