Reposted by Ron DeSantis
The statement critiques the process of constitutional amendment, suggesting skepticism about the executive's role in declaring amendments. It uses sarcasm to question the legitimacy of the process and advocates for term limits for Congress. The tone is critical and somewhat humorous, aiming to provoke thought about constitutional processes and governance.
- The statement does not directly harm but uses sarcasm to critique governance, which could be seen as constructive criticism.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding of constitutional processes, though it uses sarcasm which might not foster empathy.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks, focusing on the process rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.