Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement appears to be a critique of political actions, specifically focusing on presidential pardons and suggesting ulterior motives behind them. It implies a lack of transparency and accuses the president of using pardons strategically for personal or political gain.
- The statement does not directly harm with words but implies wrongdoing without evidence, which could be seen as harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it accuses individuals of being political accomplices without substantiated evidence. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is accusatory and lacks constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes accusations without engaging in a reasoned debate. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but may not use the platform responsibly, as it makes serious accusations without evidence. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.