Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement discusses a public event involving Chief Justice Roberts and former President Trump, referencing a previous incident with former President Obama. It critiques the timing of the oath administration, linking to a detailed analysis of a past event. The tone is light and somewhat humorous, focusing on procedural aspects rather than substantive public issues.
- The statement does not cause harm; it humorously critiques a procedural aspect of a public event. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved, focusing on public actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in light criticism of a public figure's actions without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.