Curtis J Berger Jr.
@CurtisJBergerJr
·
174d
The statement critiques the Newmark Foundation's role in funding anti-disinformation efforts, suggesting it contributes to censorship. It engages in public discourse by addressing issues of media influence and political donations. The tone is critical and dismissive, indicating a strong stance against perceived censorship.
- The statement may cause harm by labeling anti-disinformation efforts as a 'censorship rat’s nest,' potentially undermining legitimate efforts to combat misinformation. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy or dignity of those involved, using derogatory language like 'rat’s nest.' [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead opting for a dismissive tone without offering a nuanced critique. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.