The statement questions the number of pardons issued by President Biden compared to previous presidents, as shown in the chart. It implies a need for explanation or justification for the higher number of pardons.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could imply criticism without context.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not promote understanding or empathy, as it lacks context or explanation for the pardons. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites dialogue but could be seen as a leading question without supporting information.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.