Matt Taibbi

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -42

The statement appears to be a sarcastic remark in a political discussion, possibly implying a lack of awareness or understanding by the other party. It doesn't directly engage with the substantive issues raised in the conversation, such as the influence of political parties on tech companies or the role of public servants.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but uses sarcasm, which may not promote constructive dialogue.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it uses a dismissive tone. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for a sarcastic retort. [-1]