Matt Taibbi

The statement by @mtaibbi constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to COVID-19, vaccine efficacy, and government transparency. The tone is critical and investigative, aiming to highlight perceived shortcomings in public health communication and policy.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to public skepticism about vaccines, which may indirectly cause harm. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does question the actions of public figures, which is a legitimate part of public discourse.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is more focused on criticism and highlighting perceived failures. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   There is no acknowledgment of mistakes in the statement, but it is not clear if any were made.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to question public health narratives, which could be seen as contributing to societal debate. [+1]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech principles by questioning authority and public narratives, using the platform to raise issues of public concern. [+1]