The statement reports on a policy change by the Trump State Department regarding flag displays at U.S. embassies, which is a matter of public interest and discourse. It highlights a shift from the previous administration's policy, touching on issues of national symbolism and representation of social movements.
- The statement itself does not directly cause harm, but the policy it reports on may be seen as exclusionary by some groups. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the policy could be perceived as dismissive of certain social movements. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it reports on a policy that may be divisive. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not facilitate constructive dialogue either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to inform the public about a significant policy change, which can contribute to civic awareness. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by reporting on a government policy, but the policy itself may be seen as limiting expression at embassies.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.