The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant public policy decision by a former President, which impacts diversity, equity, and inclusion (D.E.I.) initiatives. It also invites further discussion on a public platform.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could indirectly affect those who support D.E.I. initiatives.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more informational.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not facilitate constructive dialogue either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to inform the public about a significant policy change, which can be seen as contributing to societal awareness. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by discussing a public policy issue, but the integrity of the platform is not clear from the statement alone. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.