The statement critiques the legacy media for losing audience trust due to reporting errors and suggests that podcasts have gained influence as a result. It dismisses concerns about the influence of certain podcasters, implying that the focus should be on media failures instead.
- The statement could be seen as harmful by dismissing concerns about the influence of certain podcasters, potentially undermining legitimate discussions about media influence. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it dismisses concerns raised by others, which could be seen as disrespectful.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy and understanding towards those raising concerns about podcast influence, focusing instead on criticizing legacy media. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage constructively with the opposing viewpoint, instead dismissing it without addressing the underlying issues. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.