Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement is a critical response to a conversation about the Trump Administration's decision to revoke security clearances of former intelligence officials. It accuses these officials of partisanship and election interference, suggesting their insights are politically biased. The tone is accusatory and dismissive, reflecting a strong political stance.
- The statement uses strong language and accusations, which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement accuses specific individuals of misconduct without evidence, which could be seen as disrespectful to their dignity and privacy, potentially violating this principle. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather makes personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against former intelligence officials, violating this principle. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.