Reposted by Matt Taibbi
The statement expresses a strong opinion against perceived government censorship and celebrates an executive order aimed at restoring free speech. It uses a confrontational tone, directly addressing and criticizing specific public figures. The statement implies that these figures are on the wrong side of a fundamental value, which is free speech.
- The statement uses a confrontational tone, which may not promote understanding or empathy, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By directly addressing and criticizing specific individuals, the statement may not fully respect their privacy and dignity, potentially violating this principle. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses a divisive tone and language. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in personal attacks rather than constructive criticism, violating this principle. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.