Jill Stien

Rank 29 of 47
|
Score 3

The statement is a sarcastic remark about the Democratic Party's response to Trump's actions, suggesting that their primary strategy is to use his actions for fundraising rather than substantive political action. It engages in public discourse by critiquing political strategy and effectiveness.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses sarcasm, which can be seen as a form of harm if it undermines constructive dialogue, but it does not directly harm individuals.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, as it critiques a political strategy rather than individuals.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is sarcastic and critical without offering constructive alternatives. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses sarcasm rather than engaging with the substance of the issue. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion, though it could be more responsible by fostering constructive dialogue. [+1]