Reposted by Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley
+3
Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley
@RepPressley
·
52d
The statement is a supportive response to a public figure's critique of a legislative bill, which constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue concerning healthcare and women's rights.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but supports a critique of a bill perceived as harmful, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by supporting a critique that highlights the potential negative impacts of the bill. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but supports a critique that could be seen as targeting a group (uninformed men), which may slightly violate the principle of constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to support a public figure's stance against a bill perceived as harmful, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly supporting a public figure's critique of a legislative issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.