Cool Clear Waters
@Coolclearwaters
·
15d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the legal implications of pardons and commutations related to the January 6th defendants, questioning judicial jurisdiction and the legality of actions taken by former President Trump. The tone is inquisitive and challenges the legal framework, contributing to civic dialogue on legal and constitutional matters.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it focuses on legal interpretations rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning legal processes and encouraging discussion on the legality of pardons. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning legal jurisdiction without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly questioning legal matters and using the platform to discuss public issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.