In reply to:
Hawk-I-Doc
@C1evrNameHere
·
278d
Diablo Maas
@DiabloMaas
·
278d
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
278d
The statement engages in a discussion about media bias and censorship, referencing past calls to revoke Fox's FCC license and bans on public figures. It suggests a concern about consistency in applying standards of free speech and censorship across political lines.
- The statement does not directly harm but implies criticism of actions perceived as harmful to free speech.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It accuses others of hypocrisy, which could be seen as a personal attack, but it also invites dialogue on media treatment. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to highlight perceived inconsistencies in media censorship, which could contribute to societal discourse on free speech. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- It touches on free speech issues, questioning the fairness of media treatment across political lines. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.