Charm City Circulator
@Baltimoron87
·
12d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of the Department of Defense budget and the qualifications of a nominee for a significant government role. It critiques both political parties and the Pentagon's management, suggesting a need for reform.
- The statement uses strong language ('obscene boondoggle-clusterfuck') which could be seen as harmful or disrespectful, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the use of derogatory language could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism without offering constructive solutions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the Pentagon and political figures but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments against individuals in the conversation. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech by critiquing government spending and leadership, but the use of inflammatory language may not align with using the platform responsibly.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.