The statement engages with a public issue, specifically the topic of immigration and deportations, and questions the symbolism of waving a foreign flag during a protest. The tone suggests confusion and possibly criticism of the protestors' actions.
- The statement does not directly harm with words, but it could be perceived as dismissive or critical of the protestors' actions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the dignity of the protestors by implying a contradiction in their actions. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on the optics rather than the underlying issues of the protest. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a rhetorical question without inviting discussion or understanding. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to question a public action, but it could be more responsible by fostering dialogue rather than just presenting a critique.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.