The statement and accompanying conversation engage in public discourse by discussing the funding of gain-of-function research and its potential violation of a ban, implicating public figures and policies. The tone is accusatory and dismissive, with some participants using derogatory language.
- The statement and conversation may cause harm by spreading potentially misleading information without clear evidence, violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The conversation includes derogatory language and personal attacks, violating the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is accusatory and lacks constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The conversation includes personal attacks and lacks constructive criticism, violating the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.