The statement discusses the potential of AI to extend human healthspan and criticizes traditional scientific perspectives. It suggests a transformative shift in science due to digital superintelligence.
- The statement does not directly harm but challenges existing scientific views, which could be seen as disruptive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding of new technological possibilities, though it may lack empathy towards traditional scientists. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement criticizes traditional scientists but does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.