Reposted by Peter H. Diamandis, MD
The statement provides information about the number of H100 chips purchased by major tech companies and suggests skepticism about their ability to innovate without these resources, while hinting at a project called Deepseek. It implies a critique of the tech industry's reliance on hardware for AI development.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies criticism of tech companies' innovation strategies.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more critical and skeptical in tone. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of tech companies but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to question the practices of major tech companies, potentially encouraging discourse on innovation and resource use. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing a critical opinion on tech industry practices. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.