The statement critiques the naming of legislative acts, suggesting they are misleading. It implies skepticism towards political strategies and legislative effectiveness. The accompanying image contrasts proposed and enacted immigration policies in Florida, highlighting perceived inadequacies.
- The statement uses a critical tone but does not directly harm individuals, focusing instead on political actions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but could be seen as dismissive of legislative efforts, potentially undermining dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism of political actions but lacks constructive dialogue or specific suggestions for improvement. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.