Reposted by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
The statement critiques the Office of Personnel Management for failing to remove metadata from PDFs, revealing the authors' identities and their affiliations with the Heritage Foundation and Project 2025. It implies a lack of competence and suggests a potential bias in the guidance being published.
- The statement does not directly harm individuals but implies incompetence, which could be seen as harmful to reputations. It does not explicitly violate the principle but could be more tactful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by not revealing personal information beyond professional affiliations, which are relevant to the public discourse. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement critiques the competence of the Office of Personnel Management without engaging in personal attacks, focusing on the issue rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to highlight a potential issue of transparency and bias, which is a responsible use of the platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.