Reposted by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
The statement and the referenced conversation involve a discussion about conditioning state aid based on political outcomes, which touches on public issues related to governance, electoral integrity, and disaster aid. The tone suggests a critique of political motivations behind policy decisions.
- The statement implies harm by suggesting aid is conditioned on political outcomes, which could be seen as a violation of doing no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, thus respecting privacy and dignity.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it highlights political motivations rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement critiques a political stance but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a potential misuse of power, which could be seen as aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by critiquing political actions, using the platform to raise awareness of potential issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.