Forrest Saunders
@FBSaunders
·
100d
The statement criticizes a legislative bill, calling it weak despite proposed changes, and advocates for stronger policies. It reflects engagement in public discourse by addressing legislative effectiveness and public feedback.
- The statement does not directly harm but uses strong language to criticize the bill, which could be seen as a call for improvement.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting perceived weaknesses in the bill, though it lacks specific constructive suggestions.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the bill but does not attack individuals, focusing instead on the policy itself. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.