Ayanna Pressley

Rank 8 of 47
|
Score 183

The statement criticizes the Trump administration's decision to freeze federal funding, highlighting the potential harm to public welfare and expressing approval of a judicial intervention. It engages in public discourse by addressing a significant policy issue with implications for public health and welfare.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement highlights the potential harm of the funding freeze, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm by advocating against policies perceived as harmful. [+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement criticizes the Trump administration's actions but does not engage in personal attacks, focusing instead on the policy's impact. [+1]
  3. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to advocate for the reversal of a policy perceived as harmful, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech to critique a government policy, using the platform responsibly to engage in civic dialogue. [+1]