The statement involves congressional leaders discussing the impacts of a former president's agenda, which is a matter of public interest and political discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as critical of a political agenda.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement may promote understanding by discussing impacts, but the hashtag and imagery suggest a critical stance.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in political critique, which can be constructive, but the tone may be perceived as adversarial. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.