snakeman
@yzmrzztrtn
·
39d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing a rule related to government spending transparency, which is a public issue. The tone is informal but provides an opinion on the implications of the rule.
- The statement does not use harmful language and maintains a neutral tone, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does contribute to the discussion by providing an opinion, which is neutral in this context.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, adhering to the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to discuss a public issue responsibly, adhering to the principle of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.