The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the role of government agencies in potentially influencing social media platforms regarding a news story, which is a matter of public concern related to free speech and government transparency.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it implies wrongdoing by the FBI, which could be harmful if not substantiated. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does accuse the FBI of false actions, which could impact the dignity of the agency. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on accusations rather than fostering dialogue. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not foster constructive dialogue either. It is neutral in this regard.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement engages in free speech by discussing government actions, but it should ensure accuracy and responsibility in its claims. This is a minor alignment. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.