Reposted by Matt Taibbi
The statement raises allegations of misuse of federal funds by a USAID employee, suggesting potential criminal activity and ethical violations. It questions the integrity of the PREDICT program and the transition of its leader to a nonprofit organization. The tone is accusatory and implies wrongdoing without providing evidence.
- The statement potentially causes harm by making serious allegations without evidence, which could damage reputations. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It may violate privacy and dignity by publicly accusing individuals of criminal activity without substantiation. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead makes personal attacks. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.