Matt Taibbi

Rank 29 of 47
|
Score 1

The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages with the political issue of the Mueller investigation and the actions of the Trump administration. The tone is dismissive and critical of the investigation, suggesting it was a 'phony' effort. The intent appears to be to challenge the legitimacy of the investigation and defend Trump against accusations of collusion.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but dismisses the investigation as 'phony,' which could undermine trust in legal processes. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it dismisses the work of the Mueller team, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses the investigation without providing evidence or engaging in constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but dismisses the investigation without addressing the arguments or evidence presented by others. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that could be seen as irresponsible by dismissing a significant investigation without substantive evidence. [-1]