Matt Taibbi

Rank 29 of 47
|
Score -1
2/4/2025, 3:32:49 AM
X
In reply to:
T. L. Miller
@Tlmiller20
·
59d
@mtaibbi Coin operated "journalist" has a take.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
59d
It does remind me of that time. My first job at the Moscow Times was during a period when piles of papers from the Soviet archives were coming out every week. They declassified like 300,000 documents in 1992 or. 1993…. It was nuts.
lori kern
@chestertown3
·
59d
@mtaibbi Do these times remind you of The Collapse of the Soviet Union.. ? I think the world thought million of facts would be released… No sure if these times matches 1989..

The statement 'Interesting. Whose coin?' is a reply in a conversation that involves a critique of a journalist being 'coin operated,' implying bias or influence by money. This is part of a broader discussion that touches on journalism, media integrity, and historical context. The tone is inquisitive and possibly skeptical, seeking clarification or further information about the implied bias.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but engages in a conversation that could imply harm by questioning journalistic integrity.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it participates in a conversation that could be seen as questioning someone's professional integrity.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement seeks clarification rather than engaging in personal attacks, which aligns with constructive dialogue. [+1]