Jill Stien

Rank 30 of 47
|
Score 3

The statement engages with public discourse as it addresses significant geopolitical issues, specifically the proposal of a U.S. takeover of the Gaza Strip and the implications of such actions. It critiques both major U.S. political parties, suggesting they are responsible for severe humanitarian consequences.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses charged language that could incite harm, such as 'ethnic cleansing/genocide', which may not strive to do no harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it involves a proposal that could lead to forced relocation and potential harm to a population. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses inflammatory language and does not offer constructive solutions. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in broad criticism of political parties without constructive dialogue or specific evidence, which could be seen as a form of ad hominem attack. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to critique political actions, but it does so in a way that may not contribute positively to societal betterment due to its divisive language. [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or uphold integrity, given the potential for inciting division. [-1]