Nate.Smokes
@nateoncannabis
·
74d
The statement critiques past actions of intelligence officials and Congress, suggesting they initiated a baseless investigation that disrupted government operations. It contrasts this with current claims of a coup, implying skepticism about the latter. The tone is critical and somewhat sarcastic, aiming to highlight perceived past governmental misconduct.
- The statement does not directly harm individuals but criticizes actions of public officials, which is a part of public discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, as it focuses on actions of public figures in their official capacity.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on criticism rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of public actions but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to critique governmental actions, which can be seen as an attempt to hold public officials accountable, potentially contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by engaging in critique of public actions, using the platform to express a viewpoint on governmental issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.