The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the suppression of information related to vaccine injury claims and the importance of investigating and publishing stories based on evidence. It touches on the broader debate about vaccine safety and public health transparency.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies that suppressing information is harmful, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for transparency. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement encourages investigation and publication of stories, which can promote understanding and empathy if done responsibly, but it does not explicitly promote these values. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement suggests engaging in dialogue by investigating and publishing stories, which aligns with constructive criticism, but it does not address personal attacks or ad hominem arguments in the broader conversation. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by advocating for the investigation and publication of claims, using the platform to encourage transparency and integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.