Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses issues related to freedom of the press, potential governmental overreach, and the rights of journalists. The tone is serious and the intent is to inform the public about a personal experience that raises broader concerns about press freedom and legal rights.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it is a factual recounting of events.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the author's experience without engaging in harassment or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement implicitly promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the challenges faced by journalists, though it could be more explicit in fostering compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on the situation and its implications. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the author's influence to raise awareness about potential issues with press freedom, contributing to societal betterment. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using the platform to discuss significant public concerns. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.