Larry Beall
@LarryBeall4
·
152d
The conversation revolves around the airing of an interview with a public figure during a major sports event. It questions the completeness of the broadcast, which could be seen as engaging with media transparency and public access to information.
- The statement does not cause harm and is a straightforward inquiry about media coverage. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on media practices rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning the completeness of the broadcast without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.