Stinson Norwood
@snorman1776
·
138d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing fiscal policy, government spending, and political strategy, which are substantive public issues. The tone is critical of current spending levels and suggests a return to pre-Covid spending while increasing military and border funding.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but it does imply a significant policy shift that could have broad impacts.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on policy critique. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a specific fiscal policy change, which the speaker believes would benefit society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by engaging in a policy discussion and using the platform to express a viewpoint. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.