Jill Stien

Rank 29 of 47
|
Score 9

The statement is a critical commentary on a political issue involving international relations and alleged actions by a public figure, thus constituting public discourse. It uses strong language to condemn a proposed plan and calls for action from a specific leader.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be considered harmful, as it accuses a public figure of planning ethnic cleansing, which is a serious allegation.Ā [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does use harsh language that could be seen as disrespectful.Ā [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on condemnation rather than dialogue.Ā [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses strong accusations and does not offer a platform for discussion.Ā [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to rally support against a proposed plan, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by opposing what it views as a harmful action.Ā [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to the inflammatory language used.Ā [-1]