The statement 'Why should we “have the back” of the Digital Services Act?' constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue related to digital policy and governance. The tone is inquisitive, seeking to provoke discussion or debate about the support for the Digital Services Act. The intent appears to be to question or challenge the rationale behind supporting this legislative measure.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does invite discussion, which can lead to greater understanding.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is framed as a question, which encourages dialogue and does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by questioning a public policy and using the platform to engage in civic dialogue responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.