Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement appears to engage in public discourse as it references political figures, public opinion polls, and societal issues such as immigration and gender recognition. The tone suggests a focus on political analysis and public sentiment.
- The statement does not directly harm with words and actions, but it could contribute to divisive discourse by highlighting polarizing topics without context.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it could be seen as lacking respect for the dignity of those with differing views on gender and immigration. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it presents statistics without context or dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents information in a way that could be seen as confrontational rather than inviting discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech but could use its platform more responsibly by providing context and encouraging informed discussion.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.