Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with the topic of free speech, censorship, and historical context, contributing to a broader civic dialogue on these issues. The tone is critical and analytical, aiming to argue against censorship by referencing historical events and outcomes.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, as it focuses on historical analysis and critique of policies.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing historical context and analysis, though it could be more empathetic towards differing perspectives. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of historical and current policies, avoiding personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by advocating against censorship and using the platform to discuss its perceived failures. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.