John Wisniewski
@WhiskeyMD247365
·
138d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing issues related to censorship, electoral integrity, and freedom of speech in the context of international politics. It questions the actions of the EU, Germany, and the UK, comparing them to 'despots,' and implies criticism of these entities' policies.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words, but it uses charged language that could contribute to a polarized discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it makes broad accusations against countries without specific evidence, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses a confrontational tone and does not seek to bridge differences. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses the opposing view without addressing the underlying arguments. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that could be seen as irresponsible, as it makes serious accusations without substantiation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.