Matt Taibbi

Rank 34 of 47

Score -42

You don’t need credentials to be in the free press. In fact I sometimes think they’re a net minus. Credentials have nothing to do with “freedom of the press.”
By the way, I’ve had credentials denied by both parties, even when I represented Rolling Stone or Random House.

DrGad 💔

@drgad1900

141d

@mtaibbi Always excuses. You either for free press or against it

2/17/2025, 12:36:11 AM

The statement by @mtaibbi engages in public discourse by discussing the role of credentials in journalism and the broader implications for freedom of the press. It critiques the reliance on credentials and suggests that they may not be necessary for effective journalism, thus contributing to a debate on media access and freedom.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not directly harm others but uses strong language ('pussies') that could be seen as disrespectful, slightly violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by challenging the notion that credentials are necessary for journalism, but the use of derogatory language ('pussies') detracts from a respectful dialogue. [-1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement upholds the principle of free speech by advocating for the ability to engage in journalism without credentials, aligning with the responsible use of a platform to discuss media freedom. [+2]