The statement expresses frustration with the idea of 'normalizing' certain media outlets, suggesting that traditional news sources have failed, leading audiences to seek alternatives. It defends the presence of partisan outlets in journalism, implying that restricting them is unfair.
- The statement uses strong language but does not directly harm others. It critiques media outlets and the idea of normalization.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in harassment or hate speech but dismisses concerns about misinformation.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and dismisses opposing views without addressing their substance. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.