Aaron Rupar
@atrupar
·
16d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing issues related to the Fourth Amendment and the rights of individuals, as well as responding to a public figure's comments. The tone is confrontational and defensive, aiming to assert one's rights and criticize another's actions.
- The statement uses confrontational language, referring to others as 'cowards,' which could be seen as harmful and not in line with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does involve name-calling, which can be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for personal attacks and dismissive language. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.