Robert Craigen
@RCsEvilTwin
·
144d
The statement and its context involve a discussion about the term 'online violence' and its perceived misuse or exaggeration. The tone is sarcastic and dismissive, aiming to critique the concept of 'online violence' by making a joke about the support provided to victims. The intent seems to be to question the legitimacy or seriousness of the term 'online violence' and the responses to it.
- The statement uses sarcasm that could be seen as dismissive of the experiences of those who feel harmed by online interactions, potentially causing harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it could be perceived as disrespectful to those who consider themselves victims of online violence. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards individuals who might be affected by online violence. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; instead, it uses sarcasm and mockery, which could be seen as a form of personal attack on those who use the term 'online violence.' [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.