We're At Abnormal 2.0
@gettingmorenorm
·
145d
The statement critiques the selective outrage over the denial of press credentials, suggesting that attention should be given to independent journalists who face this issue more frequently than established organizations like the AP. The tone is somewhat dismissive and sarcastic, aiming to highlight perceived hypocrisy in the reaction to the AP's situation.
- The statement does not directly harm others but uses a dismissive tone that could be seen as undermining the seriousness of the issue.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses the concerns of those affected. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses the issue as idiotic and refers to those concerned as 'babies.' [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement attempts to use influence to highlight the struggles of independent journalists, which could be seen as a positive use of influence. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but could be more responsible and constructive in its approach.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.